[erlang-questions] Get Erlang node uptime and way to test it is working
Mithun B
mithunb@REDACTED
Thu Jun 22 06:37:40 CEST 2017
Hi Rickard Green,
Thanks for your valuable reply and will consider your suggestion of
using erlang:convert_time_unit/3 instead of assuming nanoseconds.
Regards,
Mithun B
On Tuesday 20 June 2017 04:26 PM, Rickard Green wrote:
>
> tis 20 juni 2017 kl. 09:21 skrev Mithun B <mithunb@REDACTED
> <mailto:mithunb@REDACTED>>:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We are using "erlang:statistics(wall_clock)" to get the Erlang node up
> time in millisecond.
>
> It works fine till 49 days, but on 49th day it will role back to start
> from 0 millisecond.
>
> I need to know two things here, First of all, a different method
> for how
> to test it, I don't want to wait for 49+ days to see it works or not.
>
> Secondly, I need to know a method which gives proper up time even
> after
> 49+ days. How about following:
>
> "(erlang:monotonic_time() - erlang:system_info(start_time)) div
> 1000000000"
>
>
> Apart from the assumption of nanosecond native time unit this is the
> way to do it. Use erlang:convert_time_unit() instead. There are Erlang
> systems not using nanoseconds as native time unit.
>
> Regards,
> Rickard Green, Erlang/OTP
>
>
> If any one having more insight on this, please shed some light on
> these
> topics.
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> Mithun B
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED <mailto:erlang-questions@REDACTED>
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
> --
> Rickard Green, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20170622/05e98e0d/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list