[erlang-questions] Problem with binary_to_term on different machines
Sverker Eriksson
sverker.eriksson@REDACTED
Wed Feb 1 14:54:46 CET 2017
https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-340
I just merged e27119948fc6ab28bea81019720bddaac5b655a7
and pushed to maint and master.
Thanks for the reminder, Mikael.
WARNING: The preliminary source patch I published
earlier (seen below) will leak memory. The fix I just merged
has a different solution.
/Sverker
On 02/01/2017 02:31 PM, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Sverker Eriksson writes:
> > Correction: Bug exists since OTP-17.0.
> >
> > (and i tags R16B02_yielding_binary_to_term and
> > OTP_R16B03_yielding_binary_to_term)
> >
> > /Sverker
> >
> >
> > On 01/20/2017 05:17 PM, Sverker Eriksson wrote:
> > > This is indeed a problem in Erlang VM code (shallow copy of inflate
> > > state)
> > > that has existed since R16B03, but not caused actual problem until
> > > zlib v1.2.9.
> > >
> > > Fix coming up. Here is a preliminary patch for the impatient.
>
> Has this landed in OTP master yet? I've been keeping a look out for it,
> but haven't seen it (I may have missed it of course).
>
> I'd like to backport it to our internal OTP-18 and OTP-19.
>
> /Mikael
>
>
>
> > >
> > > diff --git a/erts/emulator/beam/external.c
> > > b/erts/emulator/beam/external.c
> > > index beed847..1c4fff5 100644
> > > --- a/erts/emulator/beam/external.c
> > > +++ b/erts/emulator/beam/external.c
> > > @@ -1431,6 +1431,10 @@ static B2TContext* b2t_export_context(Process*
> > > p, B2TContext* src)
> > > if (ctx->state >= B2TDecode && ctx->u.dc.next == &src->u.dc.res) {
> > > ctx->u.dc.next = &ctx->u.dc.res;
> > > }
> > > + else if (ctx->state == B2TUncompressChunk) {
> > > + int cres = inflateCopy(&ctx->u.uc.stream, &src->u.uc.stream);
> > > + ASSERT(cres == Z_OK); (void)cres;
> > > + }
> > > hp = HAlloc(p, PROC_BIN_SIZE);
> > > ctx->trap_bin = erts_mk_magic_binary_term(&hp, &MSO(p), context_b);
> > > return ctx;
> > >
> > >
> > > /Sverker, Erlang/OTP
> > >
> > >
> > > On 01/19/2017 04:14 AM, Michel Boaventura wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> I've build erlang 19 from scratch on my gentoo machine but can't use
> > >> dialyzer, because it complains my beam files weren't compiled with
> > >> debug_info.
> > >>
> > >> I've read and debugged a log of dialyzer and erlang code and find out
> > >> the
> > >> issue is that for some reason erlang can't parse the abstract part of
> > >> the
> > >> files.
> > >>
> > >> To check this I save the abstract part on a file and tried to parse
> > >> it on
> > >> my gentoo machine and on a Ubuntu server I have access. For some
> > >> reason I
> > >> don't know it reads with no problem Ubuntu but gives me an invalid
> > >> arg on
> > >> gentoo.
> > >>
> > >> I'm very new to erlang and have no clue of how to debug further. The
> > >> binary
> > >> is attached and I'm reading it like:
> > >>
> > >> {ok, [Binary]} = file:consult("Abstr").
> > >> Term = binary_to_term(Binary).
> > >>
> > >> ps: I've sent a message similar to this one on this list, but since
> > >> it was
> > >> my first one I think it wasn't accepted (and I do apologize for the
> > >> double
> > >> post if you received it). But after it I've discovered the problem with
> > >> binary_to_term, so that message isn't so useful anyway.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> erlang-questions mailing list
> > >> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > >> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > erlang-questions mailing list
> > > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > _______________________________________________
> > erlang-questions mailing list
> > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list