Sat Oct 29 12:28:33 CEST 2016
> Le 28 oct. 2016 à 13:53, Joe Armstrong <erlang@REDACTED> a écrit :
> Ten minutes of playing with rebol (from www.rebol.com)
> was enough to convince me that the current way GUIs are
> built is a total mess.
> I get the impression that GUI programming is actually going
> backwards - in the 80's there were systems build on languages
> like TCL that did not need GByte downloads and complex IDEs.
> Nowadays a Graphics Library can easily be a GByte of code -
> so what went wrong - in the 1980's and entire OS with graphics
> was a few tens of MBytes ....
In the 1980s each system had its own look'n'feel, its own set of keyboard shortcuts, etc etc.
I'm already annoyed when a text field isn't the system widget because some keybindings I'm accustomed too are missing, I just couldn't use an application of which the whole GUI is custom.
How many graphical systems in the 1980s that were powered by Tcl/Tk were usable by visually-impaired people?
How many of them came with a text-to-speech subsystem? How many of them could allow users to set a higher contrast or a higher aspect ratio?
> Le 28 oct. 2016 à 16:18, Joe Armstrong <erlang@REDACTED> a écrit :
> The canvas widget in HTML seems to be about the right level of
> abstraction - actually all one needs is a widget that can draw things
> using the SVG
> path and group commands ...
The canvas widget means you just produce pixels. How can that be accessible?
More information about the erlang-questions