[erlang-questions] Other supervisor implementations?

Oliver Korpilla oliver.korpilla@REDACTED
Wed Nov 23 11:50:58 CET 2016


I was left with the impression that restart on error - like with "transient" - was also not available. Only the equivalent of "temporary".


On November 23, 2016 10:38:54 AM CET, "Alex S." <alex0player@REDACTED> wrote:
>23 нояб. 2016 г., в 10:19, Oliver Korpilla <Oliver.Korpilla@REDACTED>
>> Hello.
>> I asked some questions about the various supervisors available in OTP
>a while ago. The impression I was left with is that once you have to go
>dynamic/simple_one_for_one you essentially lose most features you'd
>want out of supervision.
>With simple_one_for_one you lose only in-order termination (and indeed,
>there’s no semantic order you can impose on the children, as the order
>of launch is accidental and subject to races),
>and the ability to launch an arbitrary child spec. That’s about it.
>(The upgrades might also suck if you decide to completely change the
>childspec: your children will need to handle the upgrade themselves
>> Are there any other, alternate supervisor implementations out there
>to extend the range of options?
>> Thank you,
>> Oliver

Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20161123/4ed8b7de/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list