[erlang-questions] Rhetorical structure of code: Anyone interested in collaborating?

Richard A. O'Keefe <>
Thu May 12 03:33:56 CEST 2016



On 12/05/16 4:18 AM, Lyn Headley wrote:I guess you missed this, so I'll 
repeat myself:
> "Express puzzlement is a bit lazy on youth's part, so before submitting
> her question youth may annotate this event with language."

My point is that "may" should be "must".  "Express puzzlement" is not
"a bit" lazy, it is disruptively lazy
> But I also don't want to overwhelm the elder. Following every move on
> a video channel is probably too much work for the elder.
So fast forward to tags?

I think we're starting to make a case for pair programming,
and I don't want to go there.



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list