[erlang-questions] [ANN] Positive version 13.3.7

ok <>
Sat Mar 26 08:03:53 CET 2016

> I'm wondering whether nobody can't see the actual benefit of providing a
> library that does such a trivial thing, but not more.

When I read the code, I laughed, and then surmised that it was meant
as just such an example.  I actually thought it was a good one.

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list