[erlang-questions] Updating Myths of Erlang Performance

[PAILLEAU Eric]

Hi Björn,
make sens, but in such case a "trouble-shooting" / "common caveat" / 
"performance issue" link in 'fun' paragraph to Myths paragraph should be 
done for people wanted to go further.
I know it is another thing to maintain, but as far documentation is 
bigger and bigger, links are really usefull.
I sometime remember having readen something interresting in 
documentation and do not remember where, and find it again weeks later 
fortuitously, while do not need it anymore.
but I suppose it is a general problem in all big documentation.



Le 04/06/2016 09:51, Björn Gustavsson a écrit :
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Éric Pailleau <eric.pailleau@REDACTED> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I think it would be better to move fun myths/reality in fun paragraph,  and
>> so on.
>> So that newcomers are aware of what they should / shouldn't do by reading
>> related paragraph. Erlang documentation is big, and sometimes difficult to
>> find some informations unless reading the whole regularly...
>> Myths of Erlang should be kept only for general myth regarding Beam or other
>> languages comparison, Mho.
>
> We intentionally wanted to keep most information about efficiency in
> one place, in the Efficiency Guide, not sprinkled throughout the
> doumentation. The idea is not to worry about performance until you
> have measured your correct solution and found it to be too slow.
>
> /Björn
>