[erlang-questions] Erlang offensive paper

[Technion]

Hey guys,


I stumbled on this on reddit and found it to be a great read:


https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz8Lmg2kodQiRXYwWVpGNXQtdG5hNG5GaDFFNF9UNXp4UXo4/view

[https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/DjEvzXdgdUZQq0MJ7xUmtpzZ1vb5_yiehoviMLZyCJmchFy2C5rOWaBMXXLQXRHWf4wUsL7Y46g=w1200-h630-p]<https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz8Lmg2kodQiRXYwWVpGNXQtdG5hNG5GaDFFNF9UNXp4UXo4/view>

In Defense of Erlang.pdf<https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz8Lmg2kodQiRXYwWVpGNXQtdG5hNG5GaDFFNF9UNXp4UXo4/view>
drive.google.com


I can't find a date on this so apologies if you've all seen it or it's years old.


Does anyone know if there is anything in the works or proposed around the "If someone gets inside the network, the cookie is the only protection left" situation?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20160601/4542c112/attachment.htm>