[erlang-questions] Why we need a -module() attribute?
Richard A. O'Keefe
Fri Feb 26 00:38:02 CET 2016
On 25/02/16 11:36 pm, Loïc Hoguin wrote:
> I still run into this, mostly when refactoring. When moving code
> around I usually end up with wrong separators. It's often in lists or
> maps when writing one item per line. If I could have an optional comma
> for the last item in the list I wouldn't have to compile, get an
> error, fix it and compile again.
I think I wrote an EEP about that. (Search search)
Yes, EEP 21, "Optional trailing comma for lists and tuples"
These days it should mention records and maps as well.
> I did rationalize it, "it's like sentences!" and you probably did too.
Actually, I thought "it's like Prolog." Banged into a wall a couple of
"EXCEPT that most clauses end with a semicolon instead of a full stop."
Coming from Prolog meant that my personal style was to NEVER put
semicolons at the end of lines.
Maybe I should lay functions out like
; foo(...) ->
; foo(...) ->
My actual preference would be to simply say that an atom
or hyphen in column 1 implies either a semicolon or full stop
before it, whichever is appropriate.
> If you really never run into issues with them you either never
> refactor code, do tools assisted refactoring or are smarter than
> everyone else.
There's another possibility: I might refactor, but just be too bad at
it for this issue to be significant. (:-)
More information about the erlang-questions