[erlang-questions] Proposal for new state machine engine: gen_statem

Benoit Chesneau <>
Thu Feb 11 12:32:25 CET 2016


hrm how does it helps to figure the changes in the source code though?
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 at 12:25, Raimo Niskanen <
> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:04:00PM -0800, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> > Do you have a standalone implementation of gen_statem? It would be
> > great to test converting some existing code, and see how it feels.
>
> Here is a tarball containing 6 ebin/*.beam files to replace in lib/stdlib
> in an OTP-18.2 installation:
>   http://erlang.org/~raimo/OTP-18.2-stdlib-ebin-gen_statem.tgz
>
> Keep the original files around.
>
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:56 AM, Raimo Niskanen
> > <> wrote:
> > > Hi all!
> > >
> > > I have created a pull request for a new state machine engine in the
> gen_*
> > > framework.  There is a heated discussion right now on GitHUB:
> > >
> > >     https://github.com/erlang/otp/pull/960
> > >
> > > Please contribute with an opinion.
> > > --
> > >
> > > / Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > erlang-questions mailing list
> > > 
> > > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> > _______________________________________________
> > erlang-questions mailing list
> > 
> > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
> --
>
> / Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> 
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20160211/02993149/attachment.html>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list