[erlang-questions] Idiomatically handling multiple validation checks
qp
quantumpotato@REDACTED
Tue Dec 6 00:16:16 CET 2016
Hi, I am new to Erlang and wrote this code for validating that the Name,
Action & Target atoms passed in to validRequest are all valid.
validRequest(valid, valid, Target) ->
case validName(Target) of
true -> true;
false -> false
end;
validRequest(valid, Action, Target) ->
case validAction(Action) of
true -> validRequest(valid, valid, Target);
false -> false
end;
validRequest(Name, Action, Target) ->
case validName(Name) of
true -> validRequest(valid, Action, Target);
false -> false
end.
I've since refactored into
validRequest(Name, Action, Target) ->
validName(Name) and validAction(Action) and validName(Target).
I'm curious what a more idiomatic way of writing this would be? I've seen a
mix of styles using booleans for return values and tuples, with errors
listed. I don't think that's needed here but I'm just curious how you would
handle multiple validation checks, especially if they were more complicated
than this example. Thank you!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20161205/77075ede/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list