[erlang-questions] Cowboy - cowboy_req:reply

[Theepan]

Also wanted to share that the server is running on a VM instance and the OS
is CentOS 7.

When I restarted the node every thing started working fine. When this
happens next time, I would also problem if the node itself is prevented
from accessing the file system.


On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Theepan <vasdeveloper@REDACTED> wrote:

> Now when I probed what happens during the 500 error, I see the following
> error in the Erlang logs.
>
> Ranch listener http had connection process started with
> cowboy_protocol:start_link/4 at <0.2399.0> exit with reason:
> {cowboy_handler,[{class,error},{reason,{badmatch,{error,enoent}}},{mfa,{cowboy_static,init,2}},{stacktrace,[{filename,absname,1,[{file,"filename.erl"},{line,68}]},{cowboy_static,init_dir,3,[{file,"../src/cowboy_static.erl"},{line,82}]},{cowboy_handler,execute,2,[{file,"../src/cowb
>
> But all the files are present in the server, and their read access rights
> have not changed.
>
> Do you have a quick guess?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Loïc Hoguin <essen@REDACTED> wrote:
>
>> Never heard of it but feel free to open a ticket with more details.
>>
>> If there's a 500 error then there's probably a related log sent to
>> error_logger.
>>
>> On 08/01/2016 11:39 PM, Theepan wrote:
>>
>>> I noticed another issue with Cowboy. When it comes to static files, once
>>> or twice a day they fail to deliver with "500 - Internal Server Error".
>>> Dynamics pages are working fine.
>>>
>>> Is there any any issue?
>>>
>>> When the server (Erlang Node) is restarted, things work fine back, then
>>> after about 10 hours or so again the same pattern recurred. Unless you
>>> restart the node, the error is persistent.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:28 AM, Loïc Hoguin <essen@REDACTED
>>> <mailto:essen@REDACTED>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     No, 2.0.0-pre.3 and below are pretty similar to 1.0.4 in terms of
>>>     known bugs (for the same features).
>>>
>>>     Anything in between is anyone's guess.
>>>
>>>     On 08/01/2016 06:20 PM, Theepan wrote:
>>>
>>>         Great Loïc..
>>>
>>>         Were there any serious bugs in 2.0.0-pre.2 ?
>>>
>>>         On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Loïc Hoguin <essen@REDACTED
>>>         <mailto:essen@REDACTED>
>>>         <mailto:essen@REDACTED <mailto:essen@REDACTED>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>             No!
>>>
>>>             I am finishing up changes to what will be released as
>>>         2.0.0-pre.4. I
>>>             will start recommending this version which, although it
>>> won't be
>>>             finished, should be pretty close to the final interface.
>>>
>>>             It'll be out before the end of summer.
>>>
>>>             On 08/01/2016 05:01 PM, Max Lapshin wrote:
>>>
>>>                 Btw, is it time to convert all production code to
>>> cowboy2?
>>>
>>>
>>>                 _______________________________________________
>>>                 erlang-questions mailing list
>>>                 erlang-questions@REDACTED
>>>         <mailto:erlang-questions@REDACTED>
>>>         <mailto:erlang-questions@REDACTED
>>>         <mailto:erlang-questions@REDACTED>>
>>>                 http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>>
>>>
>>>             --
>>>             Loïc Hoguin
>>>             http://ninenines.eu
>>>             Author of The Erlanger Playbook,
>>>             A book about software development using Erlang
>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>             erlang-questions mailing list
>>>             erlang-questions@REDACTED
>>>         <mailto:erlang-questions@REDACTED>
>>>         <mailto:erlang-questions@REDACTED
>>>         <mailto:erlang-questions@REDACTED>>
>>>             http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     --
>>>     Loïc Hoguin
>>>     http://ninenines.eu
>>>     Author of The Erlanger Playbook,
>>>     A book about software development using Erlang
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Loïc Hoguin
>> http://ninenines.eu
>> Author of The Erlanger Playbook,
>> A book about software development using Erlang
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20160802/50d809bc/attachment.htm>