[erlang-questions] Erlang OTP 18 memory leak / SSL
Sereysethy TOUCH
touch.sereysethy@REDACTED
Mon Sep 21 12:05:52 CEST 2015
Hello,
My application is both TLS-client & server. It is a web server which allows
client browser to connect to server using websocket. I use cowboy as web
server & web socket server.
In erlang 17, our application runs for weeks and there is no memory issue.
We only restart it whenever we have a new update. But since we update to
elang 18, we need to restart our application every 2 hours.
I use erlang.mk to compile our application, I am not sure how to set
application env. settings. Is it the same if I use erlang.mk?
Thanks,
Sethy
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Ingela Andin <ingela.andin@REDACTED>
wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> 2015-09-21 10:09 GMT+02:00 Sereysethy TOUCH <touch.sereysethy@REDACTED>:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> One question, why did my application work fine on Erlang 17.5.x branch?
>>
>>
> Well I am not sure what your application does.
>
> If you have a client application that spawns a lot of parallel connections
> to the same host, not waiting for one to succeed before spawning,
> the client session table could grow a lot. However I have implemented a
> feature to only save unique TLS-sessions in this senario to avoid this, and
> there was a bug so that this feature did not work, that I have fix in the
> maint branch. This bug however was in 17 as well as 18.
>
> However the ets info you sent suggest you have a server application and
> then setting session_liftime can help keeping the servers session table
> smaller. This also is true for clients, that can get a big table also
> through connecting to many diffrent servers.
>
> Maybe your application can be both a TLS-client and server? There is no
> obvious reason from what you told us so far that it should work better in
> 17 then 18.
>
>
> If I want to set this session_lifetime option, where should put it?
>>
>>
> It is an application environment setting. Search for app in the docs.
>
>
> So there is no use that I should build the erlang 18 from maint branch?
>>
>>
>
> It is always a good thing to try the latest version, and if you still have
> a problem it would be good if you could try providing a way to reproduce
> the problem.
>
> Regards Ingela Erlang/OTP tema Ericsson AB
>
>
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Sethy
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Ingela Andin <ingela.andin@REDACTED>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> 2015-09-20 15:24 GMT+02:00 Sereysethy TOUCH <touch.sereysethy@REDACTED>
>>> :
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I did as what you told me by getting a shell console on the node.
>>>>
>>>> I run memory(). and see ets ate the most memory. And it increased
>>>> overtime. I run ets:i(). and I found out the ssl_manager took a big chunk
>>>> of what memory used.
>>>>
>>>> 32794 client_ssl_otp_session_cache ordered_set 0 89
>>>> ssl_manager
>>>> 36891 server_ssl_otp_session_cache ordered_set 1564 67995
>>>> ssl_manager
>>>> 40993 httpc_manager__session_cookie_db bag 0 299
>>>> httpc_manager
>>>>
>>>> So I think there is a problem with ssl_manager in Erlang OTP 18.
>>>>
>>>> Any workarounds?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, the bug I fixed with the session table is on the client side. But
>>> your big ets table is on the server side.
>>> Session data is by default fairly long lived (24 h that is the max
>>> recommended time to keep a session by the RFC),
>>> you can set the ssl application variable session_lifetime to make its
>>> lifetime shorter which should mitigate your problem.
>>> We have a backlog item to make a configurable threshold of max sessions
>>> allowed to be stored in the table, which I am sure will be
>>> implemented fairly soon but alas not for 18.1.
>>>
>>> Regards Ingela Erlang/OTP Team - Ericsson AB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Sethy
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Jesper Louis Andersen <
>>>> jesper.louis.andersen@REDACTED> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Sereysethy TOUCH <
>>>>> touch.sereysethy@REDACTED> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I just recently updated Erlang to latest version OTP 18 on Ubuntu
>>>>>> server. It uses cowboy (websocket), ranch, ssl, erlydtl & rabbitmq. It used
>>>>>> to work fine in OTP 17. The program is correctly compiled but during the
>>>>>> execution the memory kept increasing. I need to restart the process every
>>>>>> one or two hours to free some memory.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Get a shell console on the node
>>>>> 2. call 'memory().' in the shell
>>>>> 3. If it reports ets as the winner, call
>>>>> 4. ets:i().
>>>>>
>>>>> This will give you a nice overview for where to look and verify it is
>>>>> the SSL problem.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> J.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> erlang-questions mailing list
>>>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>>>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20150921/efb3a446/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list