[erlang-questions] Modeling Recursion into Tail Recursion

ok <>
Sun Mar 15 09:28:46 CET 2015


> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 07:57:22AM -0700, Harit Himanshu wrote:
>> *Question*
>>    2. Can we turn every recursive function into tail-recursive? If no,
>> how
>>    to identify?
> As for the second question I'm not 100% sure I'm remembering this
> correctly but using continuation-passing-style you could express every
> recursive function with tail-recursion.

Yes you can but it's not USEFUL to do so.
Put very briefly, CPS style means passing an extra argument
to each function, called a "continuation".  This is a function
that expresses "what to do next".
Basically, it *is* the recursion stack you would otherwise have
had, disguised as a function.

There are plenty of good reasons to do this, such as situations
where a function needs more than one continuation, or you want to
simulate long-distance return, or you want a function that can
return more than once, e.g., to do backtracking.

But using CPS in order to use tail recursion is like cutting
slots in nails so you can use a screwdriver on them.




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list