[erlang-questions] Garbage Collection, BEAM memory and Erlang memory

Erik Søe Sørensen <>
Wed Mar 4 20:52:25 CET 2015


Good to hear.
Although... Graphs or it didn't happen?  :-)
Den 04/03/2015 16.57 skrev "Roberto Ostinelli" <>:

> Yes.
> It stabilized impressively the whole thing.
>
> I also tried HAproxy (single CPU), and stud. Both were far from being able
> to handle the load that I'm throwing at them. I mean, *far*.
>
> Best,
> r.
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Benoit Chesneau <>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Roberto Ostinelli <>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ah yes, indeed. The SSL processes I keep forgetting about.
>>> I'm tempted to do another run with this option in.
>>>
>>>
>> Did you have any success with it? In our own tests it just mitigate the
>> issue for some times, but it is still growing over the time.
>>
>> - benoit
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Loïc Hoguin <>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> He makes a good point, you are using hibernate yes, but that doesn't
>>>> hibernate SSL processes themselves. With hibernate_after the SSL processes
>>>> would hibernate too.
>>>>
>>>> Not sure if that would solve anything though, and SSL can probably be
>>>> made more stable without the need to hibernate, which has a cost on its own.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> erlang-questions mailing list
>>> 
>>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> 
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20150304/bff3dd27/attachment.html>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list