[erlang-questions] Garbage Collection, BEAM memory and Erlang memory

Roberto Ostinelli <>
Wed Mar 4 16:56:45 CET 2015


Yes.
It stabilized impressively the whole thing.

I also tried HAproxy (single CPU), and stud. Both were far from being able
to handle the load that I'm throwing at them. I mean, *far*.

Best,
r.

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Benoit Chesneau <> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Roberto Ostinelli <>
> wrote:
>
>> Ah yes, indeed. The SSL processes I keep forgetting about.
>> I'm tempted to do another run with this option in.
>>
>>
> Did you have any success with it? In our own tests it just mitigate the
> issue for some times, but it is still growing over the time.
>
> - benoit
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Loïc Hoguin <> wrote:
>>
>>> He makes a good point, you are using hibernate yes, but that doesn't
>>> hibernate SSL processes themselves. With hibernate_after the SSL processes
>>> would hibernate too.
>>>
>>> Not sure if that would solve anything though, and SSL can probably be
>>> made more stable without the need to hibernate, which has a cost on its own.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> 
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20150304/17b314e2/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list