[erlang-questions] JSON Parser
Kannan
vasdeveloper@REDACTED
Wed Jul 15 20:00:12 CEST 2015
Is any of them supporting Erlang 'record' as their base for
encoding/decoding. I see many of them are doing it with just list of tuples
of binaries.Erlang records best match the structure of JSON format.
JSON
----------
{"name": "Theepan",
"work": "Coding",
"salary": "0"
}
Matching Erlang record
-----------------------------------
-record( json_record,
{
'name' = "Theepan",
'work' = "Coding",
'salary' = "0"
}
}
Thanks,
Theepan
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Jesper Louis Andersen <
jesper.louis.andersen@REDACTED> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Kannan <vasdeveloper@REDACTED> wrote:
>
>> I come across many JSON libraries. Once from MochiWeb, Other one from
>> Yaws. Third one from CouchDB. And some others through Googling.
>>
>
> There are two very popular JSON parsers in Erlang: jsx and jiffy.
>
> jsx is written in plain Erlang. It is fast, correct and since it is
> written in Erlang, it will also automatically yield for other processes in
> the system.
>
> jiffy is written as a C NIF. It is about 10 times faster than jsx, but the
> caveat is everything that has to do with C NIFs: blocking a scheduler, C
> code having errors, security considerations, etc.
>
> I tend to run with `jsx` in my projects, and then I switch away from JSON
> when it gets to slow. JSON is a bad format that should never have existed
> in the first place. We are stuck with it because it's historic alternative,
> XML, was far worse in every aspect.
>
>
> --
> J.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20150715/ba80fe3a/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list