[erlang-questions] Erlang package manager

[the.silly.sad]

On 01/03/2015 12:53 PM, Anthony Ramine wrote:
> Le 3 janv. 2015 à 10:47, Imants Cekusins <imantc@REDACTED> a écrit :
>
>> Wouldn't it be handy if the new PM used Erlang syntax to specify configuration?
>>
>> I.e., config could be an .hrl or .erl file.
>>
>> There would be defined types for config items. Maybe use records.
>>
>> Then Dialyzer could be used to validate config.
>> The .app spec file could specify the config file(s) used for this .app
>>
>> ?
>
> Turing-complete package descriptions sound like asking for problems.

it was only a question of SYNTAX, as far as i understand it.
and, yes re-use of already existing syntax is nice.