[erlang-questions] Process scope variable
Richard A. O'Keefe
ok@REDACTED
Wed Feb 18 00:43:21 CET 2015
On 18/02/2015, at 2:55 am, Imants Cekusins <imantc@REDACTED> wrote:
> Does anyone see any benefit from process scope variables?
No. We already have the process dictionary, which is exactly that.
>
> E.g.
> a()->
> A = 10,
> b().
>
> b()->
> B = A + 1.
It's a good thing I haven't had any lunch yet, or I'd have a hard
time keeping it down at this point.
However,
a() ->
put('A', 10),
b().
b() ->
put('B', get('A')+1).
> This way, there is no need to pass a bunch of static variables around.
I'm not sure what you mean by "static variables".
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list