[erlang-questions] apparent memory leak in OTP 17

[Paul Davis]

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Jesper Louis Andersen
<jesper.louis.andersen@REDACTED> wrote:
> One jiffy problem I've seen is that the binaries it produces are subbinaries
> over the original. So if one process decodes and then stuffs data into ETS,
> you keep the large binaries around. Since it is you reporting it, I guess
> you have ruled out the possibility, but it is one thing to look out for.

Is that enough of a problem you'd want to see an option to disable the
sub-binary and instead make out of the source binary?