[erlang-questions] Calling for help to improve contents on erlang.org
Tue Nov 18 23:59:07 CET 2014
David Welton wrote:
> I completely agree with Loïc: open source it so that people can work
> with it and help out.
At the risk of hijacking Bruce's request...one part of erlang.org that
_is_ open sourced is the FAQ.
One quick and easy thing anyone can help with is choosing a random
section of the FAQ and checking the links. I know, a linkchecker can
find 404s. But a linkchecker can't easily find pages that return stuff
that's no longer relevant. Nor can it find a suitable replacement link.
Fixing up answers which have aged badly is another thing I'd love help
with. I work with low-level signalling in telecom networks, so I don't
keep up with web frameworks, for instance.
Reading erlang-questions and noticing things that would make good entries
is a bigger job, but there must be people out there who notice things.
I look for subjects that
- come up 'often', i.e. the "F" in FAQ.
and - can be expressed as a fairly simple question.
and - have a straight answer which many people can understand.
and - have "staying power", i.e. will still be FAQs in three years.
FWIW, I put the FAQ on github in 2009. Since then, six people have
contributed through pull requests, including two I've never met. A
few more have contributed by email.
More information about the erlang-questions