[erlang-questions] Looking for tricky protocol examples for verification research
Sat Nov 8 17:49:28 CET 2014
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Ulf Wiger <ulf@REDACTED> wrote:
> On 30 Oct 2014, at 09:07, Scott Lystig Fritchie <fritchie@REDACTED>
> > Elsewhere, verifying the good/bad health of the gen_leader protocol.
> > Its implementations have splintered, so I'm not quite sure which one is
> > the highest quality today, perhaps this one? Ulf Wiger and/or Andrew
> > Thompson might also have some opinions …
> I do. It’s probably not the majority opinion, but I’m leaning towards
> ‘locks_leader’  as the best leader-election approach, with the huge
> proviso that it hasn’t seen much - if any - real action*, as far as I
> know. ;-)
how would you compare it to raft? Also can we add/remove dynamically nodes
which wasn't really possible with gen_leader?
> > I haven't seen any postings to this list by Augusto Becciu.
> I remember him posting back in 2010 .
> Ulf W
>  https://github.com/uwiger/locks/blob/master/doc/locks_leader.md
>  http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2010-October/054088.html
> * If anyone has some feedback about ‘locks’ in the field, please let me
> You can email me in confidence if you want. Personally, I’ve used locks in
> kvdb database, and successfully negotiated both the kvdb test suite and the
> Exosense server test suite (which also does things like passing transaction
> contexts between processes). The ‘uw-locks-integration’ branch of kvdb has
> not yet been merged into master, though, and while the idea is to
> use locks_leader in kvdb (or a Raft version), I’ve not yet gone there.
> Ulf Wiger, Co-founder & Developer Advocate, Feuerlabs Inc.
> erlang-questions mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions