[erlang-questions] Performance question
Fri Nov 7 18:22:36 CET 2014
I'm not planning to spend a lot of time on this right now, but the
binary:replace(...) was chewing a tremendous amount of system time CPU load
(and actually never finished before I got frustrated and killed it) and my
function was reporting the CPU load as 99% user time (not system time) and
finished in a reasonable time. I assume the high system time usage for
binary:replace(..) is because binary:replace(...) is doing something manic
with system calls for memory management or something?
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Loïc Hoguin <essen@REDACTED> wrote:
> binary:split and binary:replace, unlike other functions of the binary
> module, are normal Erlang functions. They also process a list of options
> before doing the actual work, so there's an obvious overhead compared to
> not doing that. In addition as has been pointed out, your code is more
> specialized so that helps too.
> On 11/07/2014 03:33 AM, Stu Bailey wrote:
>> I found
>> /significantly /slower than
>> remove_pattern(<<>>,Acc,_BinPat) ->
>> <<Byte:1/binary,Rest/binary>> = Bin,
>> case Byte == BinPat of
>> true -> remove_pattern(Rest,Acc,BinPat);
>> false -> remove_pattern(Rest,<<Acc/binary,Byte/binary>>,BinPat)
>> That was surprising to me. The built-in binary:replace() was much much
>> slower for larger BinChunk with lots of <<"\n">> sprinkled through.
>> erlang-questions mailing list
> Loïc Hoguin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions