[erlang-questions] Should 17.0.2 advertise erts-6.0.1 or erts-6.0.2?

Tuncer Ayaz <>
Tue May 27 19:26:09 CEST 2014


On 5/27/14, Sverker Eriksson wrote:
> There is no strict one-to-one mapping between OTP and erts version numbers.
>
> OTP 17.0.2 contains no changes to erts and has therefore the same erts
> version as 17.0.1.

Thanks, that makes sense.

> On 05/27/2014 07:03 PM, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > Is it in line with the new versioning policy that both 17.0.1 and
> > 17.0.2 advertise erts-6.0.1? Shouldn't 17.0.2 have erts-6.0.2?



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list