[erlang-questions] Should 17.0.2 advertise erts-6.0.1 or erts-6.0.2?

Tuncer Ayaz tuncer.ayaz@REDACTED
Tue May 27 19:03:43 CEST 2014

Previous message (by thread): [erlang-questions] Dialyzer and opaque types
Next message (by thread): [erlang-questions] Should 17.0.2 advertise erts-6.0.1 or erts-6.0.2?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Is it in line with the new versioning policy that both 17.0.1 and
17.0.2 advertise erts-6.0.1? Shouldn't 17.0.2 have erts-6.0.2?

Previous message (by thread): [erlang-questions] Dialyzer and opaque types
Next message (by thread): [erlang-questions] Should 17.0.2 advertise erts-6.0.1 or erts-6.0.2?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list