[erlang-questions] literal character syntax
Fri May 16 16:35:49 CEST 2014
On 05/14/2014 04:32 PM, Björn-Egil Dahlberg wrote:
> On 2014-05-14 16:15, Fred Hebert wrote:
>> I think the argument here is specifically about whitespace characters.
>> For example, using:
>> starts_with([$ | _]) -> space;
>> starts_with([$ | _]) -> tab;
>> |_]) -> newline.
>> Is currently allowed, but it is arguably clearer to use:
>> starts_with([$\s | _]) -> space;
>> starts_with([$\t | _]) -> tab.
>> starts_with([$\n | _]) -> newline.
>> Vlad here recommends deprecating the former case, while recommending the
>> latter form.
>> I would tend to agree for the sake of readability, but would like a
>> regular deprecation cycle with warnings explaining the recommended
>> changes ("The $<space> form is being deprecated, replace with $\s" or
> I like this proposal.
> I don't know how fast we could remove $ , $ , etc (earliest 19?) but
> we could certainly emit irritating deprecation warnings that make people
> want to fix their code.
Considering the feedback so far and not everyone being happy about it,
how about just leaving it in, but add a normal warning and enable it by
By the way, how does $ behave when used with a unicode character?
More information about the erlang-questions