[erlang-questions] No JSON/MAPS interoperability in 17.0?
Fri Mar 14 11:03:57 CET 2014
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Jesper Louis Andersen
> Yes, EDN is an interesting format.
> But don't forget data.fressian, UBF and ASN.1 BER/DER which are nice formats
> as well.
> No encoding format can rule them all it seems. But certainly, the world is
> relying far too much on JSON as it stands right now.
I didn't know about fressian, is there any Erlang implementation?
ASN.1 requires a schema which make it really different from the JSON
What would be cool at least is having a format that correctly handle
numbers and binary types instead of considering everything as string.
Also a simple way to decode json in a straming fashion.
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Alexander Shorin <kxepal@REDACTED> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@REDACTED>
>> > So I am curious in what could replace json today as an interoperable
>> > exchange data format. Message pack is interesting but not sure it's a
>> > good one (no type support). Any idea?
>> How about EDN?
>> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions