[erlang-questions] No JSON/MAPS interoperability in 17.0?

[Benoit Chesneau]

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Jesper Louis Andersen
<jesper.louis.andersen@REDACTED> wrote:
> Yes, EDN is an interesting format.
>
> But don't forget data.fressian, UBF and ASN.1 BER/DER which are nice formats
> as well.
>
> No encoding format can rule them all it seems. But certainly, the world is
> relying far too much on JSON as it stands right now.
>
>

I didn't know about fressian, is there any Erlang implementation?
ASN.1 requires a schema which make it really different from the JSON
usage imo.

What would be cool at least is having a format that correctly handle
numbers and binary types instead of considering everything as string.
Also a simple way to decode json in a straming fashion.

- benoit


> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Alexander Shorin <kxepal@REDACTED> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@REDACTED>
>> wrote:
>> > So I am curious in what could replace json today as an interoperable
>> > exchange data format. Message pack is interesting but not sure it's a
>> > good one (no type support). Any idea?
>>
>> How about EDN?
>> https://github.com/edn-format/edn
>>
>> --
>> ,,,^..^,,,
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
>
>
> --
> J.