[erlang-questions] raw_read_file_info

[Shayan Pooya]

Thanks Anthony.
What about the other operations like file:mkdir, file:rename, file:list_dir
and others that do not open the file (hence there is no raw option)? For
them we still have to use prim_file to avoid paying the price of a
round-trip. Is that right?


Regards.


On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Anthony Ramine <n.oxyde@REDACTED> wrote:

> My original post was in reply to Max, who is probably not using prim_file
> just for file_info functions. The operative word was "most".
>
> That being said:
>
>         https://github.com/erlang/otp/pull/413
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Anthony Ramine
>
> Le 27 juin 2014 à 16:21, Loïc Hoguin <essen@REDACTED> a écrit :
>
> > The functions that operate on *open* files, yes. Not read_file_info.
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20140629/e336aa7e/attachment.htm>