[erlang-questions] Erlang is *not* a implementation of the Actor model Re: Go vs Erlang for distribution
Tue Jun 24 00:14:28 CEST 2014
Raoul Duke wrote:
>> Generally Erlang implements something that "solves the problem", wheras
>> actors are just a theoretical construct.
> well yes the Actor model stuff was/is intended to be a foundational
> thing to build on top of. so when you say "theoretical construct" in a
> way it would be taken as a compliment, not an insult ;-)
> so i expect from Hewlitt et. al.'s perspective one would want to
> implement Erlang on top of actors. :-)
Seems to me that the core of the actor model is shared-nothing, message
passing concurrency. Yes there are some fine differences between the
full model as defined by Hewitt (and implemented by him in some cases)
and Erlang - but that seems to get into the world of implementation details.
Now whether any of that influenced Erlang, or was a case of parallel
invention, is a different question.
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
More information about the erlang-questions