[erlang-questions] node.js vs erlang

[Pedro Narciso García Revington]

Hey Mark,

That benchmark is a little bit outdated. Have a look at this one
http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks



2014-06-17 23:02 GMT+02:00 Mark Nijhof <mark.nijhof@REDACTED>:

> I just found this:
> http://www.ostinelli.net/a-comparison-between-misultin-mochiweb-cowboy-nodejs-and-tornadoweb/
> which I think is an interesting comparison
>
> And here is an interesting thread as well:
> http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/85975/learning-erlang-vs-learning-node-js
>
> -Mark
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Miles Fidelman <
> mfidelman@REDACTED> wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Let's not forget what node.js is, and it's intent:  It's an
>> implementation of server-side javascript, pure and simple.
>>
>> Personally, I liked Jaxer (before it died) better.  Where node.js is
>> framed more as a general purpose environment, Jaxer was framed more as
>> "let's push some the browser to the server" - which was just perfect for
>> things like database access, comms access, etc. Essentially it was 'write a
>> web page/app with javascript, then designate some of it for server-side
>> execution.'
>>
>> And Aptana did a nice job of an IDE for both client- and server- side
>> code.
>>
>> Miles Fidelman
>>
>> --
>> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
>> In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Mark Nijhof
> t:   @MarkNijhof <https://twitter.com/MarkNijhof>
> s:  marknijhof
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20140617/6478b153/attachment.htm>