[erlang-questions] Which technology I should choose?
Thu Jun 12 09:56:33 CEST 2014
No offense taken or anything. Just the way you say it makes it sound
like you didn't know about cowboy_rest. cowboy_rest implements the same
state machine as WebMachine, and the Cowboy router implements a similar
routing mechanism to WebMachine, so using Cowboy or WebMachine should be
equivalent for REST tasks, simple or not. It's the same callbacks and
(If you haven't guessed from this post, yes, WebMachine was a big
inspiration for many things in Cowboy.)
On 06/12/2014 01:23 AM, Lee Sylvester wrote:
> Hey Loïc,
> I meant nothing by it. I had to build a Socket.IO compatible server
> recently, and Cowboy was my first choice. I simply find WebMachine gets
> the job done when that job is a super simple task and I need full REST
> without thinking too hard about it.
> On 11 Jun 2014, at 17:21, Loïc Hoguin <essen@REDACTED
> <mailto:essen@REDACTED>> wrote:
>> Cowboy has had Webmachine based REST for more than 2 years now. Am I
>> missing something obvious that Webmachine has or are people simply not
>> aware of the implementation in Cowboy? If there is something that can
>> be improved I'd like to hear about it.
>> Loïc Hoguin
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> From:Lee Sylvester <lee.sylvester@REDACTED
>> Sent:Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:58:48 +0200
>> To:Ivan Carmenates García <co7eb@REDACTED <mailto:co7eb@REDACTED>>
>> Cc:erlang-questions@REDACTED <mailto:questions@REDACTED>
>> Subject:Re: [erlang-questions] Which technology I should choose?
>> I find Cowboy provides a lot of flexibility, but WebMachine provides a
>> “quick to market” solution. WebMachine also helps you build cleaner
>> code. Mochiweb is useful, but since WebMachine is built on it, I’d
>> say it’s WebMachine hands down.
>> On 11 Jun 2014, at 16:42, Ivan Carmenates García <co7eb@REDACTED
>> <mailto:co7eb@REDACTED>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I’ve been wondering if I could ask for an advice from the community
>>> to help me choose a good tec for a project I am developing.
>>> My primordial priority is not to be productive, I like pure Erlang as
>>> it is, no dummy frameworks for productivity, I’m looking for
>>> something clean and powerful at the same time, I already choose Extjs
>>> 4.2 for the view, because the project is about accounting and
>>> statistics, and the graphics and visual that extjs gives is a very
>>> nice and interesting fact. I have a weak choice for yaws for the
>>> server at the time.
>>> What I would like to know is if there is another web server better
>>> than yaws to combine it with extjs, the idea is to export an API REST
>>> or another kind of API that allows a good communication with extjs
>>> using json, also that supports for web-socket or any real-time server
>>> push technology, that is primordial since I need a real-time app, ex:
>>> Chicago Boss have a very interesting mechanism to do that, since it
>>> use a long-polling strategy, that is very interesting, the only
>>> problem and almost impossible to deal with CB is the errors
>>> formatting and definition. A good documentation is required too.
>>> I hope someone can help me to decide.
>>> I will appreciate all kind of suggestions.
>>> Best regards,
>>> erlang-questions mailing list
>>> erlang-questions@REDACTED <mailto:erlang-questions@REDACTED>
More information about the erlang-questions