[erlang-questions] Version numbering scheme change and the implication / Re: [ANN] Erlang/OTP 17.0-rc1 has been released.

Tuncer Ayaz <>
Fri Feb 14 17:05:01 CET 2014


On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Rickard Green wrote:
>
>
> fredagen den 14:e februari 2014 skrev Tuncer Ayaz:
>>
>> - 17.0.1.0.1 is 17.0.1 + 1st separate patch after 17.0.2 release
>>
>> - 17.0.1.0.0.1 is 17.0.1 + 2nd separate patch released next
>>
>> - 17.0.1.1 is 17.0.1 + 1st 'normal' patch
>>
>> - 17.0.1.2 is 17.0.1 + 2nd 'normal' patch
>>
>> Is that correct?
>
>
> No, in the normal case the version number never get more parts than
> <X>.<Y>.<Z>. If the version number has more parts than this, we've
> been forced by external requirements to publish the patch.

You're right, I shouldn't have used the word 'normal', and this was
referring to the other unusual case described in your 'four sequential
fixes' example.



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list