[erlang-questions] epgsql coordination?

Anton Lebedevich <>
Thu Feb 13 17:23:40 CET 2014

On 02/13/2014 07:51 PM, David Welton wrote:
>> Does it make sense to have it shown as a fork? I would suggest pushing a new repo there instead of forking from davidw :)
> I'm not sure how to accomplish that, and to be honest, it is a fork of
> my repository which I had forked from mabrek's.  It'd be cleaner to
> post his as where it was forked from.
> I think the first order of business is to see if I can get the tests
> he had in there working 100%.  With tests, it gets easier to move
> forward without too many worries...

Timeout tests are broken in my fork (mabrek/epgsql) because I haven't
implemented timeout support yet. Client side timeouts turned out to be
quite complicated in asynchronous model. Maybe we need to steal ideas
from semiocast/pgsql and use server-side timeouts?

These tests pass in original (wg/epgsql) but timeout support is not
complete there too (there are situations when connection could stuck
after timeout).

Anton Lebedevich.

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list