[erlang-questions] epgsql coordination?

[Ali Sabil]

Also it would be great if the branches were cleaned up, leaving only what's
relevant


On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Ali Sabil <ali.sabil@REDACTED> wrote:

> Does it make sense to have it shown as a fork? I would suggest pushing a
> new repo there instead of forking from davidw :)
>
> I will have some pull requests ready soon!
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:29 PM, David Welton <davidnwelton@REDACTED>wrote:
>
>> Well, let's give it a go:
>>
>> https://github.com/epgsql/epgsql
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/epgsql
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Ali Sabil <ali.sabil@REDACTED> wrote:
>> > I would love to see that happen!
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:50 PM, David Welton <davidnwelton@REDACTED>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Is there anyone interested in trying to make a proper open source
>> >> project of the Postgresql epgsql client, in the sense of coordinating
>> >> efforts via a mailing list, merging patches, and not just forking the
>> >> code willy-nilly?
>> >>
>> >> https://github.com/mabrek/epgsql/network
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> David N. Welton
>> >>
>> >> http://www.welton.it/davidw/
>> >>
>> >> http://www.dedasys.com/
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> erlang-questions mailing list
>> >> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>> >> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> David N. Welton
>>
>> http://www.welton.it/davidw/
>>
>> http://www.dedasys.com/
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20140213/73581376/attachment.htm>