[erlang-questions] dets "undocumented" feature?
Evgeny M
donpedrothird@REDACTED
Fri Feb 7 12:47:05 CET 2014
It works at least from R15B1
пятница, 7 февраля 2014 г., 15:25:56 UTC+4 пользователь Dmitry Kolesnikov
написал:
>
> Ah, this is R16 feature! Thanks!
>
> - Dmitry
>
> On 07 Feb 2014, at 13:21, Evgeny M <donped...@REDACTED <javascript:>>
> wrote:
>
> Name = term() %%http://www.erlang.org/doc/man/dets.html#type-tab_name
>
> пятница, 7 февраля 2014 г., 15:09:58 UTC+4 пользователь Dmitry Kolesnikov
> написал:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was constantly having a trouble with dets:open_file interface.
>>
>> open_file(Name, Args) -> {ok, Name} | {error, Reason}
>> Name = atom()
>>
>> Using atom() as dets identifier is not always practical, however I see
>> the major reasons behind it.
>>
>> Recently I’ve discovered that following statements works perfectly:
>>
>> {ok, R1} = dets:open_file(erlang:make_ref(), [{file, "/tmp/myfile"},
>> {access, read}]).
>> This is “long seemed” solution. When I need to temporary open dets file
>> for reading.
>>
>> do you have any insides? how safe is that to put into production?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Dmitry
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-q...@REDACTED
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20140207/97162bc8/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list