[erlang-questions] 0MQ libraries

[Pieter Hintjens]

Software != RFCs

Isn't that clear? Where is that confusion coming from. The libraries
are NOT the standards. They do not touch, in copyright terms.

There are dozens of stacks that implement ZMTP or something like it.
This is irrelevant to the license on the RFCs.

The license only affects *derived* works.

What am I not explaining here?

-Pieter

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Michael Truog <mjtruog@REDACTED> wrote:
> On 02/03/2014 06:57 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
>>
>> We developed this policy in 2007 at Digistan, it was reviewed by
>> standards lawyers, who helped design it, and it has been successful in
>> preventing private forks of our standards.
>
> Doesn't http://www.crossroads.io/ continue to be a fork of your standards
> done by one of the original programmers of ZeroMQ?
>