[erlang-questions] What lib to use for http requests

[Tony Rogvall]

Sorry. slipped on the keyboard :-)
110% that is then.

/Tony

> On 16 dec 2014, at 00:28, Erik Søe Sørensen <eriksoe@REDACTED> wrote:
> 
> You can't agree more than 110%. I thought everyone knew that...
> 
> /Erik
> 
> Den 15/12/2014 10.00 skrev "Tony Rogvall" <tony@REDACTED <mailto:tony@REDACTED>>:
> 1000% agree on this.
> 
> Unfortunately I tend to have that itch my self :-)
> But I am trying to fight it.
> 
>> On 14 dec 2014, at 23:04, Anthony Ramine <n.oxyde@REDACTED <mailto:n.oxyde@REDACTED>> wrote:
>> 
>> To replace httpc by another client? What if people fixed it instead of scratching their own NIH itches by making new ones?
>> 
>> Le 14 déc. 2014 à 22:44, Felix Gallo <felixgallo@REDACTED <mailto:felixgallo@REDACTED>> a écrit :
>> 
>>> It would be interesting to know what the OTP team's official position on accepting new libraries and deprecating old ones is, and what the process would look like (EEP?  Other?).
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions@REDACTED <mailto:erlang-questions@REDACTED>
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions <http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED <mailto:erlang-questions@REDACTED>
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions <http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20141216/69d2ce00/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20141216/69d2ce00/attachment.bin>