[erlang-questions] minor releases in Erlang?

Benoit Chesneau <>
Fri Dec 5 09:25:57 CET 2014


On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Imants Cekusins <> wrote:

> Well, a buggy release stays a buggy release:  behind times does not
> automatically imply tested.
>
> Is this then about tagging releases as buggy or tested to help distro
> packagers, application developers and users?
>

when a release is "buggy", you fix it and release a  new one.

In that case it will help any one, developers, because 17 contains some
interesting features, users, because of the first one, distro packagers
because they can have a stable releases containing interesting features for
users and applications developers.  That's is that simple.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20141205/743b9158/attachment.html>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list