[erlang-questions] erlang:process_info(Pid, messages) result order
Fri Aug 22 13:56:55 CEST 2014
I would think that LIFO are manageable through in-process publish / subscribe. However, in-the-middle process impacts the performance to compare with native queue implementation. What is you use-case for LIFO?
On 22 Aug 2014, at 14:50, Jesper Louis Andersen <> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Michael Klishin <> wrote:
> How would old messages get a chance at being processed at high message
> rates, if the order wasn't FIFO?
> Sometimes, this is actually a bad idea. LIFO mailboxes would be really really cool to have in certain situations.
> erlang-questions mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions