[erlang-questions] Reltool anyone?

Tristan Sloughter <>
Mon Aug 18 16:44:02 CEST 2014


Yea, same way as reltool basically.

The include_erts config option takes either true, false or a path to the
location of the erts to include:

{include_erts, "/path/to/alternate/erlang"}.


https://github.com/erlware/relx/wiki/configuration


On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Loïc Hoguin <> wrote:

> Hijacking this thread, can relx build releases for different target
> platforms? Like being on Linux and building OSX and Windows releases?
>
>
> On 08/18/2014 04:29 PM, Dmitry Kolesnikov wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am sharing your sarcasm… however, these tools fulfils my requirments
>> (defined in previous email).
>> If you know a better solution to address them, I’d be glad to look on it.
>>
>> - Dmitry
>>
>>
>> On 18 Aug 2014, at 16:07, Tristan Sloughter <
>> <mailto:>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>     I found reltool + rebar + Makefile is perfect approach to address
>>>     those requirements. These tools gives you enough customisation
>>>     power with very simple semantic.
>>>
>>>
>>> I never thought I'd see the word perfect and rebar, reltool or
>>> Makefile in the same sentence :)
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> 
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>>
> --
> Loïc Hoguin
> http://ninenines.eu
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20140818/ab28414b/attachment.html>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list