[erlang-questions] Unable to call functions that are in a module in the same location
Gustavo Pires
devgutt@REDACTED
Mon Aug 18 03:59:20 CEST 2014
Where's the code of construct_Agent(Specie_Id, Agent_Id, SpecCon)? You only
sent construct_Cortex. Probably the problem is there.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Strong <steve@REDACTED> wrote:
> The record will be initialised with the defaults as specified in the hrl.
> The code and stacktrace in the gist still suggest that
> SpecCon#constraint.morphology is ‘undefined’ - so something between the
> record construction below and the crash within the gist must be modifying
> the record.
>
> --
> Steve Strong
> Sent with Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig>
>
> On Sunday, 17 August 2014 at 15:36, Yves S. Garret wrote:
>
> The record in question is "constraint". The thing is, when I call it, it
> looks like this with none of the values initialized:
>
> test() ->
> Specie_Id = test,
> Agent_Id = test,
> CloneAgent_Id = test_clone,
> SpecCon = #constraint{}, % <---- HERE IS WHERE THE FIRST INSTANCE IS
> CREATED
> F = fun() ->
> construct_Agent(Specie_Id, Agent_Id, SpecCon),
> clone_Agent(Specie_Id, CloneAgent_Id),
> print(Agent_Id),
> print(CloneAgent_Id),
> delete_Agent(Agent_Id),
> delete_Agent(CloneAgent_Id)
> end,
>
> mnesia:transaction(F).
>
> My question is thus, if I make a record with #constraint{}, does that mean
> that all of its values are by default set to undefined or the default
> values that were specified in records.hrl?
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Steve Strong <steve@REDACTED> wrote:
>
> I'm guessing that this:
>
> Morphology = SpecCon#constraint.morphology,
>
>
> Is setting Morphology to 'undefined' - that's what the stack trace looks
> to be saying.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Steve
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 16 Aug 2014, at 04:54, "Yves S. Garret" <yoursurrogategod@REDACTED>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is my code:
> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/5b9b2c55a7684f5386e2
>
> When I run my code inside of erlang (17.0), this is the error that I get:
> 7> genotype:create_test().
> {aborted,{undef,[{morphology,undefined,[sensors],[]},
> {morphology,get_InitSensors,1,
> [{file,"morphology.erl"},{line,8}]},
> {genotype,construct_Cortex,3,
> [{file,"genotype.erl"},{line,41}]},
> {genotype,construct_Agent,3,
> [{file,"genotype.erl"},{line,20}]},
> {genotype,'-create_test/0-fun-0-',0,
> [{file,"genotype.erl"},{line,434}]},
>
> {mnesia_tm,apply_fun,3,[{file,"mnesia_tm.erl"},{line,833}]},
> {mnesia_tm,execute_transaction,5,
> [{file,"mnesia_tm.erl"},{line,813}]},
>
> {erl_eval,do_apply,6,[{file,"erl_eval.erl"},{line,661}]}]}}
>
> genotype.erl and morphology.erl are in the directory, so why can't
> genotype's function call morphology's functions? Or am I missing something
> else entirely?
>
> Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20140817/e6fc7186/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list