[erlang-questions] Reltool anyone?
Sun Aug 17 18:24:38 CEST 2014
Yes, rebar does nothing to help with reltool. And I'd argue it almost makes
it worse. Loic points to https://github.com/erlware/relx not to rebar.
Though hopefully rebar will use relx instead of reltool soon enough.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Ulf Wiger <> wrote:
> On 17 Aug 2014, at 18:15, Loïc Hoguin <> wrote:
> > Teaching reltool today seems quite counter productive, it is the kind of
> knowledge that you want tool implementors to have, but not normal users.
> True, but even when using reltool via rebar, you end up having to
> understand quite a lot about reltool. The only things rebar actually helps
> with are (1) generating a template for you to modify, and (2) actually
> starting reltool. But extending the reltool.config and understanding why it
> bombs tend to throw you deep into the mysteries of reltool, and rebar does
> practically nothing to buffer this.
> If something needs to be documented in this area, it would be
> Troubleshooting Reltool, IMHO: what are the typical errors, and how do they
> manifest themselves?
> Ulf W
> (I was quite instrumental in advising Dizzy to use reltool in rebar at the
> time, so for those of you who are unhappy about that choice, feel free to
> blame me. The thinking was that rebar should rely on core OTP functionality
> rather than compete with it.)
> Ulf Wiger, Co-founder & Developer Advocate, Feuerlabs Inc.
> erlang-questions mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions