[erlang-questions] [99s-extend] [ANN] Cowboy 1.0

[Paulo F. Oliveira]

Yes, it should be _that_ easy for the 400 > 422 :D, but is that the only
important difference I should be aware of, then? I haven't written any real
tests, for the time being, to guarantee backward compatibility for
dependants...

In any case, I'm thinking about updating the dependencies in the future (I
own one of them and the other one is an internal project, for the time
being).

Thanks for the tip.

Cheers.

- Paulo F. Oliveira


On 5 August 2014 21:55, Loïc Hoguin <essen@REDACTED> wrote:

> You can easily send 422 and return halt instead of returning false if you
> need to keep that, it'll just be 2 lines instead of 1. :)
>
> On 08/05/2014 10:33 PM, Paulo F. Oliveira wrote:
>
>> Hi, Federico.
>>
>> Check this out for the "why" regarding your question:
>> https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy/issues/715
>>
>> It's one of the reasons (I haven't detected others yet) stopping me from
>> moving to 1.0, unfortunately (I have some projects depending on these
>> status codes already), but as soon as I have some time and look at all
>> the _major_ differences between 0.9.0 and 1.0 I think I'll make the
>> move. For the time being, I have found no issues with the REST part of
>> cowboy (the one I use).
>>
>> Thank you, Loïc et all for the effort and for keeping it open source.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> - Paulo F. Oliveira
>>
>>
>> On 5 August 2014 15:18, Federico Carrone <federico.carrone@REDACTED
>> <mailto:federico.carrone@REDACTED>> wrote:
>>
>>     Congratulations Loic. I really love cowboy.
>>
>>     I got only one question: Why did you change the reply with 400
>>     instead of 422 in cowboy_rest for unprocessable entities?
>>
>>     Regards,
>>     Federico.
>>
>>
>>
>>     On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Max Lapshin <max.lapshin@REDACTED
>>     <mailto:max.lapshin@REDACTED>> wrote:
>>
>>         Loic, it is very cool!
>>
>>         Thanks.
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         erlang-questions mailing list
>>         erlang-questions@REDACTED <mailto:erlang-questions@REDACTED>
>>         http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     --
>>     http://federicocarrone.com/
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     erlang-questions mailing list
>>     erlang-questions@REDACTED <mailto:erlang-questions@REDACTED>
>>     http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Extend mailing list
>> Extend@REDACTED
>> https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend
>>
>>
> --
> Loïc Hoguin
> http://ninenines.eu
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20140805/34528764/attachment.htm>