[erlang-questions] [ANN] Cowboy 1.0
Paulo F. Oliveira
Tue Aug 5 22:33:17 CEST 2014
Check this out for the "why" regarding your question:
It's one of the reasons (I haven't detected others yet) stopping me from
moving to 1.0, unfortunately (I have some projects depending on these
status codes already), but as soon as I have some time and look at all the
_major_ differences between 0.9.0 and 1.0 I think I'll make the move. For
the time being, I have found no issues with the REST part of cowboy (the
one I use).
Thank you, Loïc et all for the effort and for keeping it open source.
- Paulo F. Oliveira
On 5 August 2014 15:18, Federico Carrone <federico.carrone@REDACTED> wrote:
> Congratulations Loic. I really love cowboy.
> I got only one question: Why did you change the reply with 400 instead of
> 422 in cowboy_rest for unprocessable entities?
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Max Lapshin <max.lapshin@REDACTED>
>> Loic, it is very cool!
>> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions