[erlang-questions] Any reason not to have a string:replace?

Sean Cribbs <>
Tue Apr 8 18:10:10 CEST 2014


Why not use re:replace/3,4?

http://www.erlang.org/doc/man/re.html#replace-4


On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:52 AM, David Welton <>wrote:

> It would be convenient to have something like binary:replace, but for
> strings.
>
> I'd be happy to try to put together a pull request that does this,
> although I'd likely need some help with the finer points of what
> options to add.
>
> --
> David N. Welton
>
> http://www.welton.it/davidw/
>
> http://www.dedasys.com/
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> 
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>



-- 
Sean Cribbs <>
Software Engineer
Basho Technologies, Inc.
http://basho.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20140408/7645663a/attachment.html>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list