[erlang-questions] Any reason not to have a string:replace?
Tue Apr 8 18:10:10 CEST 2014
Why not use re:replace/3,4?
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:52 AM, David Welton <>wrote:
> It would be convenient to have something like binary:replace, but for
> I'd be happy to try to put together a pull request that does this,
> although I'd likely need some help with the finer points of what
> options to add.
> David N. Welton
> erlang-questions mailing list
Sean Cribbs <>
Basho Technologies, Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions