[erlang-questions] noisy failures
t x
txrev319@REDACTED
Wed Apr 2 13:59:17 CEST 2014
Hi,
## context:
* I'm using erlang.mk + relx
* I'm running my erlang apps as one of the following:
_rel/bin/app_name start
_rel/bin/app_name console
* what I like about "_rel/bin/app_name start" <-- I feel like this
is the right way for production use
* what I like about "_rel/bin/app_name console" <-- I get noisy
failures (i.e. when something goes wrong, it floods stdout
## what I want:
I want to use "_rel/bin/app_name start", yet get the same level of
errors/warnings/assertions as I do when I run it as "_rel/bin/app_name
console"
## what I have tried:
* _rel/bin/app_name start
* _rel/bin/app_name remote_console
However, "start + remote_console" does not seem to get me the same
amount of errors as I do from "console".
## question:
Is there a wya to use start + remote_console, yet get the same level
of errors / warnings as with "console"?
Thanks!
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list