[erlang-questions] Arch Linux patches?

Loïc Hoguin <>
Thu Oct 31 22:22:52 CET 2013


I know the Makefile doesn't seem to do anything but last I checked (been 
a while) I had better performance with the precompiled version compared 
to compiling with kerl (I'm not sure if I tried with manual compilation).

I'll check again tomorrow.

On 10/31/2013 10:04 PM, Aaron France wrote:
> Demonstrably false.
>
> ArchLinux uses https://gist.github.com/AeroNotix/7257133 this to build
> it's package, no patches, no wicked switches, just a plain makefile.
>
> Aaron
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Olivier Boudeville
> < <mailto:>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I may be wrong but I think that, some time ago, someone (maybe
>     Loïc?) mentioned incidentally in this mailing list that the Arch
>     Linux version of Erlang (obtained through pacman) was reported to
>     be, at least in some cases, significantly more efficient than the
>     stock, official version (the trouble is that I can't find that
>     message from the list archives).
>
>     I was wondering if it had been confirmed, and, if yes, if there were
>     some patches sent upstream by the Arch maintainers that could be
>     fruitfully applied to the official sources?
>
>     Thanks for any information!
>
>     Cheers,
>
>     Olivier.
>
>
>
>
>
>     _________________________________________________
>     erlang-questions mailing list
>      <mailto:>
>     http://erlang.org/mailman/__listinfo/erlang-questions
>     <http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> 
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>


-- 
Loïc Hoguin
Erlang Cowboy
Nine Nines
http://ninenines.eu



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list