[erlang-questions] Is there a lomit on erlang vm nodes connection speed

[Dror Mein]

Ah ok, I disabled nodelay, and it helped me only slightly. thanks anyway.


________________________________
 From: Jon Schneider <jon@REDACTED>
To: Dror Mein <drormein@REDACTED> 
Cc: Dmitry Kolesnikov <dmkolesnikov@REDACTED>; Erlang Questions <erlang-questions@REDACTED> 
Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] Is there a lomit on erlang vm nodes connection speed
 

> I did inet:i(), and prim_inet:get_opt(S, nodelay), and found out that the
> tcp nodelay flag is actually true; so , no help there.

The idea was to disable ndelay.

If you can try clearing this bit.

Jon


> ________________________________
>  From: Jon Schneider <jon@REDACTED>
> To: Dmitry Kolesnikov <dmkolesnikov@REDACTED>
> Cc: Erlang Questions <erlang-questions@REDACTED>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 4:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] Is there a lomit on erlang vm nodes
> connection speed
>
>
> I was of course mixed up and meant TCP_NODELAY if indeed that is the cause
> of bitty message traffic.
>
> TCP (v4) overhead on ethernet starts at 78 bytes.
>
> Jon
>
>> PSH bit is extremely important when we are talking about signal plane. I
>> would see a negative impact on Erlang distribution if it is knocked out.
>> Thus, I was talking to separate concern into different perspectives.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Dmitry >-|-|-*>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20130702/231bbc1d/attachment.htm>