[erlang-questions] Restarting supervision tree

[Martin Dimitrov]

Thanks. I figured that supervisor:terminate_child/2 will actually not
trigger the recovery mechanism at all.

On 7/2/2013 1:37 PM, Jesper Louis Andersen wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Martin Dimitrov <mrtndimitrov@REDACTED>wrote:
> 
>> If I call
>> supervisor:terminate_child/2 and then supervisor:restart_child/2 on the
>> permanent worker, will this affect the maximum restart frequency?
>>
> 
> No, it will not affect the maximum restart frequency in this case. The way
> I usually figure this out
> is by reading the source code of the supervisror module however, and I am
> not sure that is the best
> way to have it documented. But at least that is one way to figure it out :P
>