[erlang-questions] Improve $handle_undefined_function
Tue Jan 22 00:10:13 CET 2013
On 01/21/2013 11:15 PM, Tony Rogvall wrote:
> On 21 jan 2013, at 19:04, Loïc Hoguin <
> <mailto:>> wrote:
>> Just recently the $handle_undefined_function feature was introduced.
>> It is a way to override error_handler mechanisms when a function isn't
>> found, and works per module for all processes, instead of just one.
>> Regardless of the intent behind this feature, the implementation that
>> was pushed to master is in my opinion, and apparently others, deeply
>> flawed. The main issue is that it pushes the responsability of
>> propagating the right errors directly to the user, and the user must
>> use extra care when writing this handler.
> This is strange. You think that every one should stay away from this
> feature, but then you start to play
> around with it your self. Why? Are better suited to handle this
> abomination than the rest of us or what?
I said stay away because the implementation is flawed. If this feature
behaves the same as any other function call, then I'm perfectly good
More information about the erlang-questions